Mr Cameron - perhaps bravely, perhaps unwisely - agreed to become the first serving British Prime Minister to appear on the largely comedy-focused Late Show during a visit to New York.
Now having watched the whole of his appearance, contrary to the headlines, it's fair to say that overall he did pretty well - and certainly avoided the biggest potential trap of taking himself too seriously in front viewers mainly looking for laughs.
And as you might expect, on the occasional serious topics David Cameron was able to give some easy-to-follow answers to explain some of the finer points of the United Kingdom to a less than totally clued-up audience across the Atlantic.
But the news media - being highly selective as they typically are - focused on those moments when he was completely stumped by host David Letterman's quiz questions.
First up, Cameron didn't know who composed Rule Britannia (understandably not being too familiar with the less-than-famous Thomas Arne).
Then he couldn't give the translation of "Magna Carta" - a rather bigger crime for someone who presumably studied Latin at Eton.
To his credit, Mr Cameron did make some self-deprecating remarks while admitting he didn't know the answers - the most drastic being "I've ended my career on your show".
But he allowed himself to be portrayed looking far sillier than he needed to.
There's a useful formula which anyone can use when being asked a question where you don't know the answer.
Mr Cameron got the first bit right: admit you don't know. This is far safer than bluffing.
But he didn't follow the essential next steps.
The second step is to briefly, and without being defensive, explain why you don't know.
"Well of course I'm only the prime minister, not the British historian-in-chief," would have been fine for the Magna Carta question.
The third step is then to gently move the conversation onwards so that you say something on the same topic that you do know.
The full Cameron-Letterman interview is here on Youtube:
If you watch it you'll see that the prime minister had earlier in the interview demonstrated he knew quite a bit about the historic document, including the fact that it was signed in 1215.
So all Mr Cameron needed to do was to move on and explain a little more about the significance of the Magna Carta for Britain, and the world.
This would have made a far more impressive conclusion to his response and would have enabled him to avoid being hit by such Letterman barbs as "it would be good if you knew this" which were fired off during the embarrassing prime ministerial silences.
The trick is that once you've dealt with a pesky question by saying you can't answer and explaining why, then you're perfectly within your conversational rights to add something you do know on the subject.
If you get this right you'll look far more authoritative and in control than David Cameron managed.
No comments:
Post a Comment